<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Proceedings 13th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.00242/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.00242/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Proceedings 13th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic — mentioned by fmap</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18414924</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1701.00242:18414924</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 15:11:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not sure what the parent meant specifically, but yes, there is quite a lot of work on quantum physics and logic, with regular conferences (https://arxiv.org/html/1701.00242) and some truly fascinating models for intuitionistic logics (https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.3468). Not being a physicist I have no idea whether this is &amp;quot;the way forward&amp;quot; for quantum physics or anything, but the results that I do understand are non-trivial so there seems to be something there...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.00242/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
