HackerPapers

arXiv:1612.09328cs.LG

The Neural Hawkes Process: A Neurally Self-Modulating Multivariate Point Process

Hongyuan Mei, Jason Eisner

Abstract

Many events occur in the world. Some event types are stochastically excited or inhibited---in the sense of having their probabilities elevated or decreased---by patterns in the sequence of previous events. Discovering such patterns can help us predict which type of event will happen next and when. We model streams of discrete events in continuous time, by constructing a neurally self-modulating multivariate point process in which the intensities of multiple event types evolve according to a novel continuous-time LSTM. This generative model allows past events to influence the future in complex and realistic ways, by conditioning future event intensities on the hidden state of a recurrent neural network that has consumed the stream of past events. Our model has desirable qualitative properties. It achieves competitive likelihood and predictive accuracy on real and synthetic datasets, including under missing-data conditions.

arXiv comments
NIPS 2017 camera-ready. New experiments including intensity prediction evaluation, sensitivity to # of parameters, training speed analysis. Results updated to use final test data instead of devtest. Improved exposition, especially of continuous-time LSTM and thinning algorithm
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Nov 2017 to Dec 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • The closest thing to a continuous-time RNN that exists are Neural Hawkes Processes [https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.09328]. They use a different model where observing the system necessarily changes its state, which is natural in some settings but doesn't fit in others. On the other…

      duvenaudView on HNParent context

  1. [dead] 1 comment
    • So the author quotes Judea Pearl, whose causal calculus led to PGMs playing a critical in computer science and science as a whole, and somehow uses that to support the idea that probability theory is useless? That is absurd and out of context. Take a look at Kaldi or any state…

      stochastic_monkView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.