<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.08012/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.08012/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge — mentioned by lscholten</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13485381</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1612.08012:13485381</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:56:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Great results! Deep learning has been gaining track in other medicine areas as well. One such task is lung cancer nodule detection from CT scans. A paper I recently co-authored applied many different architectures to this detection and achieved very good results. (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.08012.pdf) The best combination of systems detected cancer nodules which were not even found by four experienced thoracic radiologists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.08012/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
