<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum speedup of the Travelling Salesman Problem for bounded-degree graphs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.06203/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.06203/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum speedup of the Travelling Salesman Problem for bounded-degree graphs — mentioned by rdtsc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16371461</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1612.06203:16371461</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:31:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Now I was wondering about TSP why it was mentioned at all and if there were any new results since I dabbled in quantum computing. It seems with some constraints on vertex degrees, which seems to be practical, it&amp;#x27;s possible to do have some speedup (not polynomial of course). For example https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.06203 claims O(1.3^N) for 4 nodes vs O(1.6^N) for classical. For example with N=500 that&amp;#x27;s 1e57 vs 1e102. But yeah still wouldn&amp;#x27;t have picked it as _the_ example to use. Not on topic but since Scott had to mention it... &amp;gt; Would you agree that the Washington Post has been a leader in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.06203/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
