<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PAM: Parallel Augmented Maps · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.05665/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.05665/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>PAM: Parallel Augmented Maps — mentioned by moab</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41316054</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1612.05665:41316054</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:04:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Your analysis sounds reasonable to the non-expert, but recent work on purely-functional trees suggests that the gap is smaller than you suggest (&amp;quot;orders of magnitude slower&amp;quot;). E.g., see the nice work on the PAM library (https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05665). Ideas from this work were used to build lots of cool things (immutable graph data structures, segment trees, databases) that are very fast, and all immutable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.05665/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
