<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Advanced LIGO's First Observing Run · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.02029/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.02029/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Advanced LIGO's First Observing Run — mentioned by astro123</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24944701</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1612.02029:24944701</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:31:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s an interesting question. I&amp;#x27;ve never thought about it or seen that taken into account (its not something we fit to when constraining cosmology) I just looked around and LIGO has constrained Omega_GW &amp;lt; 1e-7 (they find no evidence, but that is the limit of their sensitivity). This is at least an order of magnitude smaller than Omega_Radiation and so will have a negligible effect on cosmology/total energy content. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.02029.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.02029/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
