<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Variational Information Bottleneck · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.00410/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.00410/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Variational Information Bottleneck — mentioned by sdenton4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17995268</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1612.00410:17995268</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 17:53:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Two things I believe to be true... 1) Auto-encoders are overplayed, mostly because they&amp;#x27;re a pretty easy intro ML project. There was a brief moment (before ResNets and batch normalization showed up) when they were useful for bootstrapping a representation, but they aren&amp;#x27;t serving a terribly concrete purpose now that it&amp;#x27;s so much easier to get end-to-end deeper pipelines running and learning their own representations. The common criticism is that a representation that&amp;#x27;s great for reconstruction may still not be super useful for classification (or whatever your real goal is). And, compared to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1612.00410/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
