<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>An Efficient Quantum Algorithm for a Variant of the Closest Lattice-Vector Problem · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1611.06999/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1611.06999/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>An Efficient Quantum Algorithm for a Variant of the Closest Lattice-Vector Problem — mentioned by VLM</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14412667</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1611.06999:14412667</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 19:15:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats a good paper. I thought about it awhile and would retract my remarks of it being expensive and replace it with being expensive or risky. Also there&amp;#x27;s the problem of &amp;quot;what is the definition of post quantum&amp;quot; where a lot of people call 1995 or so after Shor &amp;quot;PQ&amp;quot;, and maybe I&amp;#x27;d retract that part of my comment and call it something like &amp;quot;way way long time in the future, which by whatever definition of post quantum, is also post quantum, lets call it 3000 AD&amp;quot; The trick in the big-key RSA paper is knowing how Shor works, because the average big-O is low for a randomly selected large number…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1611.06999/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>An Efficient Quantum Algorithm for a Variant of the Closest Lattice-Vector Problem — mentioned by greeneggs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13268174</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1611.06999:13268174</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:13:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s an example: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.06999 I believe the PDF link is only removed after a paper has been withdrawn. But if you click on v1, you can still access the original paper (incorrect, in this case).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1611.06999/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>An Efficient Quantum Algorithm for a Variant of the Closest Lattice-Vector Problem — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13020820</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1611.06999:13020820</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:29:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Efficient Quantum Algorithm for a Variant of the Closest Vector Problem&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1611.06999/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
