arXiv:1610.09887cs.LG
Depth-Width Tradeoffs in Approximating Natural Functions with Neural Networks
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
We provide several new depth-based separation results for feed-forward neural networks, proving that various types of simple and natural functions can be better approximated using deeper networks than shallower ones, even if the shallower networks are much larger. This includes indicators of balls and ellipses; non-linear functions which are radial with respect to the $L_1$ norm; and smooth non-linear functions. We also show that these gaps can be observed experimentally: Increasing the depth indeed allows better learning than increasing width, when training neural networks to learn an indicator of a unit ball.
They cite https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.09887 for their definition of network depth, which defines it in such a way that e.g. a ReLU network of depth 2 is of the form linear2(ReLu(linear1(input))). That means, depth is the number of linear layers. The "depth-three" model in this…
yorwbaView on HNParent context