<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonians and Exponentially Precise Measurements · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.09619/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.09619/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonians and Exponentially Precise Measurements — mentioned by comicjk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14560793</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.09619:14560793</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:39:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are some physical systems (mathematically, &amp;quot;Hamiltonians&amp;quot;) which have this &amp;quot;stateless&amp;quot; property. However, if the time/energy uncertainty principle is true, simulating time T in O(1) cannot be possible in general unless BQP=PSPACE (the unlikely idea that quantum computers can efficiently solve any problem that can be stored in polynomial amounts of memory). See this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.09619&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.09619/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
