<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the Expressive Power of User-Defined Effects: Effect Handlers, Monadic Reflection, Delimited Control · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.09161/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.09161/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the Expressive Power of User-Defined Effects: Effect Handlers, Monadic Reflection, Delimited Control — mentioned by fmap</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18156469</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.09161:18156469</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 18:22:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re right, the linearity restriction on the handler continuation is a peculiarity of multi-core OCaml and really more of an implementation detail. However, it is also true that you cannot encode, e.g., the continuation monad using (typed) algebraic effects. The precise relationship isn&amp;#x27;t that simple, but this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.09161 analyzes a particular setting in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.09161/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
