<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is the expansion of the universe accelerating? All signs point to yes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.08972/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.08972/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is the expansion of the universe accelerating? All signs point to yes — mentioned by privong</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12838586</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.08972:12838586</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:54:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Too bad recent discoveries rule out Dark Energy: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12783631 The methodology of that paper has been questioned by other researchers in the field[0]. Among other things, the paper claiming cosmic acceleration was not significant did not factor in constraints on cosmology from other types of observations (e.g., cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations). [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08972&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.08972/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
