<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evidence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX\, J1856.5$-$3754 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.08323/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.08323/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evidence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX\, J1856.5$-$3754 — mentioned by civilian</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13091868</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.08323:13091868</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 20:09:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Another write-up that&amp;#x27;s maybe more straightforward: http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/vacuum-birefringence-04410... prepublish link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08323 pdf: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08323v2.pdf // Edit: And maybe someone can explain this to me, but the &amp;quot;polarization in -&amp;gt; polarization out&amp;quot; artist&amp;#x27;s rendering isn&amp;#x27;t in their paper. Where did it come from? Is it showing the example of what would be happening if the effect was happening at 100% ? http://cdn.sci-news.com/images/enlarge3/image_4410_2e-Vacuum...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.08323/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
