<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — mentioned by lkowalcz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14949995</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.06918:14949995</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:35:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve never heard of neural encryption before, do you have a good source for me? From the Wikipedia page for &amp;quot;Neural cryptography&amp;quot;, it seems like there&amp;#x27;s some success in using NN&amp;#x27;s for cryptanalysis, but not for constructions... Edit: Do you mean the Google GAN experiment? (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.06918v1.pdf) Ahh ok, well at least for this there looks like an attempt at defining a security model (security against some other NN). I don&amp;#x27;t really believe the security model is realistic (how do we know NN&amp;#x27;s are really that effective as adversaries?), but at least there is a model, so calling…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — mentioned by proofofstake</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14949912</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.06918:14949912</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:27:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you think neural encryption is closer to encryption? GAN-style: One network encrypts while preserving structure, another network tries to reverse engineer to the original features. Edit: No specific sources for what Numerai is using, but in general: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06918 &amp;quot;Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography&amp;quot;. Edit2: Yes, in general. I would say &amp;quot;yes, this is a valid form of encryption&amp;quot;. But I do agree that their marketing was perhaps a bit too optimistic. I have no problem calling it &amp;quot;obfuscation&amp;quot; either (I just think their method of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12945730</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1610.06918:12945730</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:18:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12898395</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1610.06918:12898395</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 07:44:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — mentioned by ecesena</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12817963</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.06918:12817963</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:47:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper [1] is by Abadi [2], which is a pretty big name in crypto. So I can assume it&amp;#x27;s something with value, wether the press can or can&amp;#x27;t convey that is another story. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.06918v1.pdf [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mart%C3%ADn_Abadi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12816193</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1610.06918:12816193</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:30:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Brain creates its own encryption methodology [paper]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — mentioned by gcr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12816049</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.06918:12816049</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:16:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Please don&amp;#x27;t editorialize. Finding the best parameters that optimize an objective function can hardly be called &amp;quot;re-writing its own code.&amp;quot; Granted, the article is just as guilty. (Edit: The article also doesn&amp;#x27;t mention self-modifying code so I&amp;#x27;m not sure where you&amp;#x27;re getting that idea from.) For the curious, here is the preprint: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.06918v1.pdf The technique is an off-the-shelf GAN that attempts to learn a transformation (not arbitrary code!) from input to encrypted output. The learned model is not Turing complete, and most importantly, is _not_ self-modifying. The…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — mentioned by trungaczne</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12815451</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.06918:12815451</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:21:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the link to the research paper (&amp;quot;Learning to protect communications with adversarial neural cryptography&amp;quot;): https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06918&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12804754</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1610.06918:12804754</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:05:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Google&amp;#x27;s Neural Network Invents Its Own Encryption&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12801859</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1610.06918:12801859</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:05:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Learning to Protect Communications with Adversarial Neural Cryptography&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06918/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
