<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Structured adaptive and random spinners for fast machine learning computations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06209/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06209/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Structured adaptive and random spinners for fast machine learning computations — mentioned by stochastic_monk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15580079</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.06209:15580079</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 16:59:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting; I&amp;#x27;ve ignored random forests more than I should. Thank you! I won&amp;#x27;t comment on your methods except to say that comparing classification over linear PCA against a kernel PCA in linearly unseparable data isn&amp;#x27;t exactly fair, and I think that providing an SVM performed on a different kernel PCA decomposition or a kernel SVM itself would be more illustrative. (Is your code available?) I generally think of neural networks as enormous meta-kernels. (Composites of &amp;lt;composites of...&amp;gt; kernels) This generally leads me to think of ways that kernels can be turned into neural network…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.06209/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
