<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.05755/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.05755/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data — mentioned by obastani</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15865222</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.05755:15865222</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 21:33:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Google has also done some foundational research on learning with privacy: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05755 https://research.google.com/pubs/pub45428.html It&amp;#x27;s hard to know for sure what they (or any company) are doing in production, but I&amp;#x27;d be surprised if they don&amp;#x27;t use these things internally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.05755/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data — mentioned by haraldurt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15615381</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.05755:15615381</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 23:38:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In one sense, no. You can guarantee privacy of any given input (or any subset of k inputs) by applying transfer learning of an ensemble of models trained on subsets of the training data [0][1]. This is useful if, for instance, you train on medical data and you don&amp;#x27;t want anyone to know that &amp;quot;John Doe, HIV+&amp;quot; was part of the input. If your adversary does not take such precautions, however, then your canary should work. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05755 [1] https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.c...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.05755/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12787442</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1610.05755:12787442</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:49:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Semi-Supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;80 points; 2 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.05755/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
