<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Amortised MAP Inference for Image Super-resolution · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.04490/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.04490/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Amortised MAP Inference for Image Super-resolution — mentioned by fhuszar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12954277</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.04490:12954277</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:24:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some of the deeper - and wider - convolutional neural network-based SR methods do this, implicitly. We have a few papers, like SRGAN (https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802) or AffGAN (https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04490) that generate pretty interesting context-aware textures. Sophisticated hallucination of missing details comes at a cost: As one would expect, in some cases the algorithm guesses incorrectly. See for example Figure 5 of AffGAN paper, column 3: when superresolving an image of a snake, the algorithm mistakenly thought it&amp;#x27;s a body of water, and produces textures accordingly. Overall we…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.04490/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
