<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Very Deep Convolutional Networks for End-to-End Speech Recognition · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.03022/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.03022/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Very Deep Convolutional Networks for End-to-End Speech Recognition — mentioned by sdenton4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16672453</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.03022:16672453</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2018 14:58:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;afaik, pure DNN models still lag seriously behind &amp;#x27;traditional&amp;#x27; HMM-based frameworks augmented by neural networks (using DNNs for specific parts of the pipeline). Last I checked a couple months ago, state of the art for HNN+DNN was something like 6% word error rate (WER). The best Seq2Seq DNN I know of hit 18% WER, dropping to 10% when a secondary language model was integrated in. (my guess is that part of the problem is leaning too heavily on the attention mechanism... a more &amp;#x27;streaming friendly&amp;#x27; framework should help reduce the load on the attention mechanism.)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.03022/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
