HackerPapers

arXiv:1610.01854cs.CV

Do They All Look the Same? Deciphering Chinese, Japanese and Koreans by Fine-Grained Deep Learning

Yu Wang, Haofu Liao, Yang Feng, Xiangyang Xu, Jiebo Luo

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We study to what extend Chinese, Japanese and Korean faces can be classified and which facial attributes offer the most important cues. First, we propose a novel way of obtaining large numbers of facial images with nationality labels. Then we train state-of-the-art neural networks with these labeled images. We are able to achieve an accuracy of 75.03% in the classification task, with chances being 33.33% and human accuracy 38.89% . Further, we train multiple facial attribute classifiers to identify the most distinctive features for each group. We find that Chinese, Japanese and Koreans do exhibit substantial differences in certain attributes, such as bangs, smiling, and bushy eyebrows. Along the way, we uncover several gender-related cross-country patterns as well. Our work, which complements existing APIs such as Microsoft Cognitive Services and Face++, could find potential applications in tourism, e-commerce, social media marketing, criminal justice and even counter-terrorism.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2016 to Nov 2016.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I'd note that they claim 89.5% accuracy(!) using the CNN classifier. One paper they reference[1] use a similar technique to attempt the (seemingly much easier) task of classifying people into Chinese, Korean or Japanese. They get 75% accuracy. 89% accuracy means that there is…

      nlView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.