<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deciding equivalence with sums and the empty type · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.01213/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.01213/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deciding equivalence with sums and the empty type — mentioned by Kutta</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15255364</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.01213:15255364</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:40:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, beta-eta reduction on Church-coded terms (as in Morte) is much weaker than what is commonly understood as supercompilation, and it is false that &amp;quot;no matter how many layers of indirection you might add the binary size and runtime performance would be unaffected&amp;quot;. This kind of statement can only theoretically hold for something like simple type theory with strong finite products and coproducts, for which (quasi) normalization has been recently shown in https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01213&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.01213/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item></channel></rss>
