<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are Word Embedding-based Features Useful for Sarcasm Detection? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.00883/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.00883/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are Word Embedding-based Features Useful for Sarcasm Detection? — mentioned by daveguy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12714892</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1610.00883:12714892</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:39:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking at the paper here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.00883 Can anyone tell me what the P R and F &amp;quot;features&amp;quot; mean in table 2? They use F-score ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F1_score ) which doesn&amp;#x27;t take into account true negatives at all. Maybe not an issue since they are evaluating the same set of GoodReads quotes across all four. The unique features contribute to an F-Score improvement of around 1% with baselines in the 50-80% range. That doesn&amp;#x27;t seem to be a significant improvement and the F-Score is just a within-test percentage measure of how good the technique is at measuring…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1610.00883/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
