https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.05337/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20405363urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.05337:20405363Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:12:49 GMT<p>Cool. Found the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.05337.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.05337/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.PLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20066782urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.05337:20066782Sat, 01 Jun 2019 02:25:29 GMT<p>They built other libraries on top of this [1] [2], and when compared to mobx [3] it indeed looks very similar, however I think the target ideal of having a small core on top of which one would build more complex computation is essential. Since Clojure is pervasively built on laziness, there has been some discussions in the community about doing the same but for incremental computation. And doing it pervasively most importantly guarantees it will work at any granularity without any manual fiddling with observables and reactions. A recent contribution to the solution field in Clojure is…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.05337/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.PL