<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by shakna</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23748941</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:23748941</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:29:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Upscaling videos. This is a hard problem. It may not even be perfectly solvable at any time in the future. When you increase the size of any kind of raster image, you&amp;#x27;re creating new information from the old. There&amp;#x27;s been some pretty good approaches out there, like this [1][2]. It uses a GAN topology for some impressive results, but is incredibly memory intensive and can take a very long time to run. I&amp;#x27;ve been working on something [0] for a good long while which is a less expensive approach. Instead of attempting to replicate everything 1:1, it intentionally allows some detail loss, whilst…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13682396</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1609.04802:13682396</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 22:16:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Adversarial Network&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by ingenter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13413810</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:13413810</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:01:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a list of various image interpolation techniques: - http://www.ifp.illinois.edu/~jyang29/papers/chap1.pdf * Image super-resolution: Historical overview and future challenges - http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/publications/papers/pickup08... * Machine Learning in Multi-frame Image Super-resolution - http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~peleg/papers/icpr90-SuperResolutio... - http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~vision/SingleImageSR.html - http://chiranjivi.tripod.com/EDITut.html - http://www.tecnick.com/pagefiles/appunti/iNEDI_tesi_Nicola_A...…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13128015</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:13128015</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 02:42:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Because that isn&amp;#x27;t true? Looking at the first thing (GANs): developed by Ian Goodfellow, who is now at OpenAI. The first linked paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.05396v2.pdf) is out of University of Michigan and Max Planck Institute. The second (https://phillipi.github.io/pix2pix/) is out of Berkeley, the third (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.04802v3.pdf) is out of Twitter (which I guess counts as a rich American tech company). Google Brain/DeepMind/FAIR/MS Research do great work, but there is plenty of great work elsewhere too. For example, just yesterday an implementation[1] of Fast Layer…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by fhuszar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12954277</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12954277</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:24:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some of the deeper - and wider - convolutional neural network-based SR methods do this, implicitly. We have a few papers, like SRGAN (https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802) or AffGAN (https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04490) that generate pretty interesting context-aware textures. Sophisticated hallucination of missing details comes at a cost: As one would expect, in some cases the algorithm guesses incorrectly. See for example Figure 5 of AffGAN paper, column 3: when superresolving an image of a snake, the algorithm mistakenly thought it&amp;#x27;s a body of water, and produces textures accordingly. Overall we…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by nuclai</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12824452</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12824452</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:49:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;(Author here.) My biggest insight from this project is that super-resolution with neural networks benefits significantly from being domain specific. If you train on broader datasets, it does pretty well but has to make compromises. Many recent papers do a comparison in terms of pixel similarity (PSNR/SSIM), and using those metrics the quality drops because high-frequency detail is punished under those criteria (even though it may look better perceptually). Reference: http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802 On GitHub, below each GIF there&amp;#x27;s a demo comparison, but on the site you can also submit your…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by ingenter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12823541</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12823541</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:33:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a list of various image interpolation techniques, with similar goal: - http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~vision/SingleImageSR.html - http://chiranjivi.tripod.com/EDITut.html - http://www.tecnick.com/pagefiles/appunti/iNEDI_tesi_Nicola_A... - http://www.eurasip.org/Proceedings/Eusipco/Eusipco2009/conte... - http://bengal.missouri.edu/~kes25c/ http://bengal.missouri.edu/~kes25c/nnedi3.zip http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=147695 - http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.00092v2.pdf http://waifu2x.udp.jp/ https://github.com/nagadomi/waifu2x http://waifu2x-avisynth.sunnyone.org/…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by dharma1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12822990</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12822990</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:17:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, it would have been nice to show other upscaling algorithms. But neural net super resolution generators can still have significantly more detail at 4-8x, as shown here http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by anotheryou</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12622005</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12622005</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 12:10:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;from trustswz&amp;#x27; comment: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802 The pic with the boat on page 13 is interesting. In the SRGAN version I would take the shore for some sort of cliff, while the original shows separated boulders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by trustswz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12620352</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12620352</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 23:21:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are interested in how it compares to bicubic or the original. Check these papers using the sub pixel convolutional layer: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05158 https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — mentioned by dharma1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12571816</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.04802:12571816</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:46:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12513554</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1609.04802:12513554</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:37:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.04802/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
