<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generative Visual Manipulation on the Natural Image Manifold · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.03552/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.03552/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generative Visual Manipulation on the Natural Image Manifold — mentioned by yubblegum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44035763</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1609.03552:44035763</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 22:49:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;TIL. Generative Visual Manipulation on the Natural Image Manifold https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03552 For me, the most intriguing aspect of LLMs (and friends) are the embedding space and the geometry of the embedded manifolds. Curious if anyone has looked into comparative analysis of the geometry of the manifolds corresponding to distinct languages. Intuitively I see translations as a mapping from one language manifold to another, with expressions being paths on that manifold, which makes me wonder if there is a universal narrative language manifold that captures &amp;#x27;human expression semantics&amp;#x27; in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1609.03552/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
