HackerPapers

arXiv:1609.02009cs.AI

Non-Evolutionary Superintelligences Do Nothing, Eventually

Telmo Menezes

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

There is overwhelming evidence that human intelligence is a product of Darwinian evolution. Investigating the consequences of self-modification, and more precisely, the consequences of utility function self-modification, leads to the stronger claim that not only human, but any form of intelligence is ultimately only possible within evolutionary processes. Human-designed artificial intelligences can only remain stable until they discover how to manipulate their own utility function. By definition, a human designer cannot prevent a superhuman intelligence from modifying itself, even if protection mechanisms against this action are put in place. Without evolutionary pressure, sufficiently advanced artificial intelligences become inert by simplifying their own utility function. Within evolutionary processes, the implicit utility function is always reducible to persistence, and the control of superhuman intelligences embedded in evolutionary processes is not possible. Mechanisms against utility function self-modification are ultimately futile. Instead, scientific effort toward the mitigation of existential risks from the development of superintelligences should be in two directions: understanding consciousness, and the complex dynamics of evolutionary systems.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CYComputers and Society

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2017 to Dec 2017. Found in 2 HN submissions from Mar 2017 to Apr 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The Merge 1 comment
    • Independently of the time frames, I also believe that the merge is our specie's only hope for survival. With apologies in advance for the self-promotion, here's a paper where I present my arguments for alternative scenarios: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02009 In short, I argue…

      TelmoMenezesView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.