<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian inference · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01987/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01987/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian inference — mentioned by eli_gottlieb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12391462</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1608.01987:12391462</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:19:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is what I completely fail to understand about Thiel: he says stuff like that, and then goes and says that democracy was a mistake, monopolies are the proper way to do business, and we need something more like a monopolist-monarch to run the place[1]. That seems like a very selective view on modernity which tries to embrace &amp;quot;science and technology&amp;quot; for the profits they can bring, while deliberately discounting what the many human sciences tell us about how humans can work and work together. Can you actually believe in, say, &amp;quot;human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01987/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian inference — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12311402</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1608.01987:12311402</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:13:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian inference&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;91 points; 22 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01987/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
