<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01350/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01350/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads — mentioned by shikhar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45240091</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1608.01350:45240091</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 14:40:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How we run it: Auto-scaled Kubernetes deployments, one for each availability zone, currently on m*gd instances which give us local NVMe. The pods are able to easily push GiBps with 1-2 CPUs used — network is the bottleneck so we made it a scaling dimension (thanks KEDA). On the client side, each gateway process uses kube.rs to watch ready endpoints in the same zone as itself, and frequently polls /stats exposed by Cachey for recent network throughput as a load signal. To improve hit rates with key affinity, clients use rendezvous hashing for picking a node, with bounded load…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01350/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads — mentioned by nwsm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24546155</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1608.01350:24546155</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:34:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The key paper (Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads) referenced in the video: [0]. Here&amp;#x27;s a similar talk by the same presenter (Andrew Rodland) from HAProxyConf 2019: [1]. It&amp;#x27;s a bit broader and less iterative/historical which I preferred about the OP. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01350&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01350/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads — mentioned by simonpure</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15680519</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1608.01350:15680519</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:29:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01350&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01350/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13236924</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1608.01350:13236924</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:55:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1608.01350/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
