https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1607.08366/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41538930urn:hackerpapers:mention:1607.08366:41538930Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:59:15 GMT<p>&quot;Designed&quot; is not right. What gives &quot;AI models&quot; (i.e. deep neural nets) a hard time is that there are very few examples in the public training and evaluation set: each task has three examples. So basically it&#x27;s not a test of intelligence but a test of sample efficiency. Besides which, it is unfair because it excludes an entire category of systems, not to mention a dominant one. If F. Chollet really believes ARC is a test of intelligence, then why not provide enough examples for deep nets or some other big data approach to be trained effectively? The answer is: because a big data approach…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1607.08366/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CV