An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation — mentioned by throwaway466453

Wed, 10 May 2017 03:37:28 GMT

> Google is usually the largest contributor to most ML conferences (NIPS, ICML, etc.) That is because of their overwhelming influence, not the quality of their publications. > They are rather straightforward to reimplement Le and Mikolov's "Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents", frequently cited as the original example of "doc2vec", could not be reproduced by Mikolov himself. [1] > and I don't think anybody is accusing them of faking their results. They sure aren't. That, too, is because of their overwhelming influence. You have to say very nicely that their results are…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation · HackerPapers discussions

An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation — mentioned by throwaway466453