<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Predictions of the atmospheric composition of GJ 1132b · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1607.03906/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1607.03906/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Predictions of the atmospheric composition of GJ 1132b — mentioned by greeneggs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13700744</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1607.03906:13700744</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:32:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My understanding of that article (and the associated preprint [1]) is that they have not detected oxygen, but are setting up theoretical models and simulations to account for oxygen that might be detectable in the future. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03906&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1607.03906/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
