Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory — mentioned by UVDMAS

Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:52:34 GMT

The paper has been rebutted by other researchers who argue that the original results hold: "This technical report revisits the analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping - using random field theory - reported in (Eklund et al., 2015). Contrary to the understandable spin that these sorts of analyses attract, a review of their results suggests that they endorse the use of parametric assumptions - and random field theory - in the analysis of functional neuroimaging data. We briefly rehearse the advantages parametric analyses offer over nonparametric alternatives and…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory — mentioned by _delirium

Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:28:52 GMT

Fwiw there's a response to an earlier (preprint) version of that paper from some of the developers of the packages in question. Preprint version of the "Cluster failure" paper, from last year: http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.01863 Response: http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08199

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory · HackerPapers discussions

Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory — mentioned by UVDMAS

Analysis of family-wise error rates in statistical parametric mapping using random field theory — mentioned by _delirium