<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Criticality in Formal Languages and Statistical Physics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06737/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06737/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Criticality in Formal Languages and Statistical Physics — mentioned by throwaway000002</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12688416</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06737:12688416</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:50:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing this lecture by Max Tegmark. He comments on the video linking to two papers on arXiv which relate to the material in the lecture: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08225 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06737﻿&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06737/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item><item><title>Criticality in Formal Languages and Statistical Physics — mentioned by clickok</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12579830</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06737:12579830</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:01:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;According to a talk by Max Tegmark[0] (and its associated paper[1]), neural nets (particularly LSTMs) might be inherently better at this sort of thing due to the way they model mutual information. Markov models are best suited to situations where an observation k-steps in the past gives exponentially less information about the present[2] (decaying according to something like λ^k for 0 &amp;lt;= λ &amp;lt; 1). Intuitively, the amount of context imparted by a word or phrase decays somewhat more slowly. That is, if I know the previous five words, I can make a good prediction about the next one, and likely the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06737/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item><item><title>Criticality in Formal Languages and Statistical Physics — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12085044</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1606.06737:12085044</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:54:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Critical Behavior from Deep Dynamics: A Hidden Dimension in Natural Language&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;175 points; 44 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06737/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item></channel></rss>
