<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients — mentioned by WithinReason</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39866387</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06160:39866387</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:05:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;1-bit weights have been a thing since at least 2016: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06160&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients — mentioned by rfoo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39547353</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06160:39547353</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:09:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is wrong. The paper described that their activation is in int8 during inference. That being said, before-LLM-era deep learning already had low bit quantization down to 1w2f [0] working back in 2016 [1]. So it&amp;#x27;s certainly possible it would work for LLM too. [0] 1-bit weights, 2-bit activations; though practically people deployed 2w4f instead. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06160&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients — mentioned by paulsutter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14133653</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06160:14133653</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:20:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s nothing about the TPU architecture that prevents use for training. Training is also done as tensor operations, and training can be done at limited precision[1]. Just because the first TPU was memory-limited doesn&amp;#x27;t mean TPUs can never be used for training. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06160&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients — mentioned by mannigfaltig</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14046462</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06160:14046462</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:57:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The brain appears to spend about 4.7 bits per synapse (26 discernible states, given the noisy computation environment of the brain); so it seems to be plenty enough for general intelligence. This could, of course, merely be a biological limit and on silicon more fine-grained weights might be the optimum. Here is another paper demonstrating very good results with just 6 bit gradients: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06160&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients — mentioned by paulsutter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13624112</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.06160:13624112</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:00:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The article misses the core issue: neural network architectures are still in flux. &amp;quot;Neuromorphic&amp;quot; chips are hardwired to one architecture, which makes them power efficient but less flexible. When designs are more stable, such chips could be more practical. Meanwhile, upcoming (non-neuromorphic) AI processors are taking two directions: larger numbers of simplified GPU-type cores (such as NVIDIA Xavier and Intel&amp;#x27;s Lake Crest/Nervana chips), and FPGAs. Simplifying cores means lower precision, as fp32 and fp64 are overkill for neural networks and take up lots of silicon. The current NVIDIA Pascal…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.06160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item></channel></rss>
