HackerPapers

arXiv:1606.06121cs.CL

Quantifying and Reducing Stereotypes in Word Embeddings

Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, Adam Kalai

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms are optimized to model statistical properties of the training data. If the input data reflects stereotypes and biases of the broader society, then the output of the learning algorithm also captures these stereotypes. In this paper, we initiate the study of gender stereotypes in {\em word embedding}, a popular framework to represent text data. As their use becomes increasingly common, applications can inadvertently amplify unwanted stereotypes. We show across multiple datasets that the embeddings contain significant gender stereotypes, especially with regard to professions. We created a novel gender analogy task and combined it with crowdsourcing to systematically quantify the gender bias in a given embedding. We developed an efficient algorithm that reduces gender stereotype using just a handful of training examples while preserving the useful geometric properties of the embedding. We evaluated our algorithm on several metrics. While we focus on male/female stereotypes, our framework may be applicable to other types of embedding biases.

arXiv comments
presented at 2016 ICML Workshop on #Data4Good: Machine Learning in Social Good Applications, New York, NY
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jul 2016 to Sep 2016. Found in 2 HN submissions from Aug 2016 to Dec 2016. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • The biggest issues of bias/fairness in ML are not to do with the algorithms or results, but the underlying data. A trivial example would be: what if you trained a classifier to predict whether a person would be re-arrested before they went to trial? Some communities are policed…

      EridrusView on HNParent context

    • The OpenAI team would be best to comment but I've not seen them note any specific intent[1] to research topics related to fairness, accountability and transparency in ML. I use those words specifically as FAT ML 2015 was part of ICML 2015[2]. While a great start, that area of…

      SmerityView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.