<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flow · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.04934/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.04934/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flow — mentioned by taliesinb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12296489</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.04934:12296489</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:23:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;VAEs can be extended to make the latent variables dependent. OpenAI&amp;#x27;s inverse autoregressive flow is one recent way that is particularly efficient: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.04934v1.pdf. Linear IAF is the simplest form of this, with it you can model normal z having an arbitrary covariance matrix. But aside from that, there is an information-theoretic view on why you might prefer VAEs over AEs. In short, having p(z|x) not be point-mass (aka an ordinary AE) allows you to bound the information flow through the bottleneck. KL loss on p(z|x) forces the network to be honest about how much…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.04934/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flow — mentioned by andreyk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11918766</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.04934:11918766</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:51:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Brief summary: a nice intro about what generative models are and the current popular approaches/papers, followed by descriptions of recent work by OpenAI in the space. Quick links to papers mentioned: Improving GANs https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03498 Improving VAEs http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04934 InfoGAN https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03657 Curiosity-driven Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning via Bayesian Neural Networks http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09674 Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03476 I think the last one seems very exciting, I expect Imitation…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.04934/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
