HackerPapers

arXiv:1606.03475cs.CL

De-identification of Patient Notes with Recurrent Neural Networks

Franck Dernoncourt, Ji Young Lee, Ozlem Uzuner, Peter Szolovits

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Objective: Patient notes in electronic health records (EHRs) may contain critical information for medical investigations. However, the vast majority of medical investigators can only access de-identified notes, in order to protect the confidentiality of patients. In the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) defines 18 types of protected health information (PHI) that needs to be removed to de-identify patient notes. Manual de-identification is impractical given the size of EHR databases, the limited number of researchers with access to the non-de-identified notes, and the frequent mistakes of human annotators. A reliable automated de-identification system would consequently be of high value. Materials and Methods: We introduce the first de-identification system based on artificial neural networks (ANNs), which requires no handcrafted features or rules, unlike existing systems. We compare the performance of the system with state-of-the-art systems on two datasets: the i2b2 2014 de-identification challenge dataset, which is the largest publicly available de-identification dataset, and the MIMIC de-identification dataset, which we assembled and is twice as large as the i2b2 2014 dataset. Results: Our ANN model outperforms the state-of-the-art systems. It yields an F1-score of 97.85 on the i2b2 2014 dataset, with a recall 97.38 and a precision of 97.32, and an F1-score of 99.23 on the MIMIC de-identification dataset, with a recall 99.25 and a precision of 99.06. Conclusion: Our findings support the use of ANNs for de-identification of patient notes, as they show better performance than previously published systems while requiring no feature engineering.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2018 to May 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Can you provide articles comparing CRFs directly with LSTMs? Most articles on LSTMs don't actually compare against CRFs and an LSTM isn't a drop in replacement for a CRF. I haven't personally seen that neural networks have uniformly beaten CRFs on all tasks. E.g. [2] directly…

      tensorView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.