<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Formal Verification of Multi-Paxos for Distributed Consensus · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01387/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01387/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Formal Verification of Multi-Paxos for Distributed Consensus — mentioned by gralx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31506374</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.01387:31506374</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 15:58:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Lamport&amp;#x27;s early Paxos papers are interesting for a lot of reasons (I particularly like his simple textbook definition of equivalence classes in &amp;quot;Generalized Consensus and Paxos&amp;quot; (2005)), but I agree that the Paxos algorithm gets lost in all the fluff. In 2016 some researchers at Stony Brook published the full (Multi-) Paxos algorithm using TLA+, including a couple of nice extras: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01387 The spec is succinct enough to commit to memory and way easier to comprehend than Lamport&amp;#x27;s prose descriptions (Lamport has never specified the Paxos algorithm in TLA+, although you…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01387/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Formal Verification of Multi-Paxos for Distributed Consensus — mentioned by gralx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29832442</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.01387:29832442</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 23:49:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Lamport has published a TLA+ spec of the Paxos consensus algorithm¹, but none I could find of the Paxos algorithm itself (aka multi-Paxos). In 2016 some academics at Stony Brook University did, along with a machine-checked TLAPS proof, updated in 2019: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01387 ¹Paxos consensus refines specs for consensus and voting. See the spec and accompanying material here: https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/tla/paxos-algorithm.html&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01387/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Formal Verification of Multi-Paxos for Distributed Consensus — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29708751</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1606.01387:29708751</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:31:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Formal Verification of Multi-Paxos for Distributed Consensus, v4 (2016, 2019)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01387/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
