<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Enhancing the LexVec Distributed Word Representation Model Using Positional Contexts and External Memory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01283/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01283/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Enhancing the LexVec Distributed Word Representation Model Using Positional Contexts and External Memory — mentioned by atrudeau</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13777720</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.01283:13777720</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 20:06:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Analogy Task results ( detailed results at http://pastebin.com/PF96nMfX ): Semantic accuracy: 63.84 % Syntactic accuracy: 67.00 % Here performance is not great (great would be &amp;gt;80% on semantic and &amp;gt;70% on syntactic). As this task requires nearest neighbor lookups, performance is impacted by vocabulary size. Since models trained using Wikipedia alone usually limit vocabulary to something ~300k words, we can try that to get scores which are comparable to those posted by the GloVe [1] and LexVec [2] papers by only using the first 300k words in the pre-trained vectors, giving the following…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.01283/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
