<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: beyond the Standard Model phenomena · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.00947/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.00947/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: beyond the Standard Model phenomena — mentioned by Jach</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41616002</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.00947:41616002</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 10:03:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From a non-expert view with no influence on the matter in any way, I do find these sorts of arguments more compelling than anything I&amp;#x27;ve seen put forward by proponents. &amp;quot;It will indirectly help with superconducting magnet tech&amp;quot; is a variant from the proponent side -- I even like this one, because it&amp;#x27;s needed for fusion. But ok, can we just fund that tech directly, with or without the purpose of enabling fusion plants, and not as pork (even if fundamentally necessary pork) to this collider project that needs to justify itself on its own merits? LHC reaches collision energy environments in the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.00947/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
