<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Toroidal Horizons in Binary Black Hole Mergers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.00436/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.00436/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Toroidal Horizons in Binary Black Hole Mergers — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44293943</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1606.00436:44293943</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 22:25:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I don&amp;#x27;t want to get into metaphysics. Black hole mergers are studied using post-Newtonian methods and numerical methods because there is no general analytical approach known. SXS, Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes, and the black hole perturbation toolkit both have web presences, you could start there. There is also an academic literature on matching the waveforms in both regimes. These are checked against results from multimessenger astronomy. &amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;d really love to see what shape two Schwarzschild blackholes (and by that I mean their event horizons because, I don&amp;#x27;t believe anything beyond…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1606.00436/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
