<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On large subsets of $F_q^n$ with no three-term arithmetic progression · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.09223/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.09223/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On large subsets of $F_q^n$ with no three-term arithmetic progression — mentioned by delhanty</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11811418</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1605.09223:11811418</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:57:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Another good link concerned with this problem is from OEIS: https://oeis.org/A090245 &amp;quot;Maximum numbers of cards that would have no SET in an n-attribute version of the SET card game&amp;quot; The OEIS links appear to have been updated to reflect the recent breakthrough of Ellenberg and Gijswijt, including their unified paper arXiv:1605.09223 from May 30.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.09223/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
