<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A basis for the implicit representation of planar rational cubic Bézier curves · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.08669/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.08669/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A basis for the implicit representation of planar rational cubic Bézier curves — mentioned by Lichtso</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45628349</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1605.08669:45628349</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;a³-bcd ≤ 0&amp;quot; formula These are the coefficients of the implicit curve, finding them can be done once upfront. For integral quadratic bezier curves that is trivial as they are constant, see: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/fsXcDj For rational cubic bezier curves it is more involved, see: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/ttVfzh And for the full complexity of dealing with self intersecting loops and cusps see: https://github.com/Lichtso/contrast_renderer/blob/main/src/f... &amp;gt; The winding number logic is usually super involved, especially when multiple sub-shapes start overlap and subtracting each…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.08669/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NA</category></item></channel></rss>
