<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wide Residual Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.07146/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.07146/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Wide Residual Networks — mentioned by vintermann</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11812353</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1605.07146:11812353</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 06:09:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup. An example from machine learning: This paper, &amp;quot;Weighted Residuals for Very Deep Networks&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08831 from May 28, cites this paper, &amp;quot;Wide Residual Networks&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07146 from May 23. Less than a week between them! And it&amp;#x27;s with good reason too, because they want to compare with state of the art on a certain problem/dataset, and that improved five days ago. Both of these papers are about very basic advances, in a sense: If you have a residual network implementation lying around (and there are plenty of open source ones), it&amp;#x27;s trivial to implement…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.07146/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Wide Residual Networks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11758923</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1605.07146:11758923</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 04:05:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Wide Residual Networks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.07146/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
