<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.02226/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.02226/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation — mentioned by psb217</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40612735</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1605.02226:40612735</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:39:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;People also often forget &amp;quot;orderless autoregression&amp;quot;, which was introduced a while back and has been reinvented many times since. See Sec 4 (pg 8) of &amp;quot;Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation&amp;quot; [https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02226]. The main difference from current work is that this 2016 paper used MLPs and convnets on fixed-length observations/sequences, so sequence position is matched one-to-one with position in the network&amp;#x27;s output, rather than conditioning on a position embedding. Of course, Transformers make this type of orderless autoregression more practical for a variety of reasons…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1605.02226/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
