<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.06328/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.06328/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations — mentioned by ben_w</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29030268</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1604.06328:29030268</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:11:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sideways motion is harder to determine than motion towards us; the former needs angular resolution, the latter doppler radar. And the sort of rock that could shift 67P from a safe to a dangerous path (LEO to 45 degrees one year ahead) would be about 13 metres radius. The Wikipedia citation is 5 years old, so I don’t know what we know today, but in 2016 the estimate was we only knew somewhere around 1.3% of asteroids between 40m and 3.5m diameter (and 0.003% of smaller than that, because things get harder to spot as you get smaller). Wiki…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.06328/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
