<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions — mentioned by m-watson</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16587303</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1604.05363:16587303</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:55:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the pre-print version of the article: https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05363 It is a kind of funny situation that springer has this published. Pre-prints are extremely useful in fields where they are widely used. Physics, my original field, uses arxiv as well as self hosted locations. I know biology is trying to do more of this as well. I really don&amp;#x27;t understand why other fields just start pushing towards this more open model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item><item><title>Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11961406</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1604.05363:11961406</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:58:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item><item><title>Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions — mentioned by jboynyc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11594155</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1604.05363:11594155</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:50:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not all disciplines use arXiv -- far from it. Especially in the humanities and social sciences, there isn&amp;#x27;t really anything comparable to arXiv. But you are right, preprints are not all that different from published papers, as this recent analysis confirmed: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05363 [edited to add:] I suppose you could look at the data (https://blog.datadryad.org/2016/04/28/sci-hub-stories/) and see what proportion of requested DOIs have a preprint version in the arXiv. I suspect it&amp;#x27;s rather small.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item><item><title>Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11564107</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1604.05363:11564107</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:43:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item><item><title>Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11535155</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1604.05363:11535155</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:31:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.05363/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item></channel></rss>
