<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Interactive Perception: Leveraging Action in Perception and Perception in Action · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.03670/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.03670/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Interactive Perception: Leveraging Action in Perception and Perception in Action — mentioned by garblegarble</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37801202</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1604.03670:37801202</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 12:35:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;I wondered the other day what the result would be if you strapped a microphone on a baby and every utterance that both the baby and mic heard was fed through speech-to-text and went toward training the baby&amp;#x27;s personal LLM. I read about a paper[1] a while back, it was a rather unpleasant animal study in cats. Using two kittens, one was free to look around, but the other they immobilised in some way, and made it see what the other kitten saw as it looked around. They discovered the immobilised kitten&amp;#x27;s visual processing did not develop normally whereas the mobile kitten&amp;#x27;s did, suggesting that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1604.03670/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item></channel></rss>
