Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive · HackerPapers discussions

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — HN submission

Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:45:31 GMT

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive – M.E. McCulloch (2016)

1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — mentioned by rb1

Wed, 09 Aug 2017 15:31:04 GMT

Yes I concur. I thought about admitting that i'm only referencing the author's blog posts was a bit "narrow", but it's also probably the best source for authoritative information on the subject. Literally "from the horses mouth". There are the arxiv papers and some other reports (that all tend to link back to either the blog or arxiv) as well. Like you, I don't have a strong physics background, so find the published papers a challenging read. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.03449v1.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — HN submission

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:59:54 GMT

Theory for Galactic Rotation Predicts EM Drive Thrust Effect

4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — mentioned by officialjunk

Sat, 19 Nov 2016 21:48:40 GMT

This paper that investigates how the EM propulsion drives might generate thrust, and as a side effect, the theory explains certain phenomena that we attribute to dark matter and dark energy. i only have undergrad physics degree, but it sounds interesting. anyone with more experience have any thoughts about this? http://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.03449v1.pdf >McCulloch (2007) has proposed a new model for inertia (MiHsC) that assumes that the inertia of an object is due to the Unruh radiation it sees when it accelerates, radiation which is also subject to a Hubble-scale Casimir effect. In this model…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — mentioned by officialjunk

Sun, 28 Aug 2016 21:15:51 GMT

came across this paper that investigates how the EM propulsion drives might generate thrust, and as a side effect, the theory explains certain phenomena that we attribute to dark matter and dark energy. i only have undergrad physics degree, but it sounds interesting. anyone with more experience have any thoughts about this? http://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.03449v1.pdf >McCulloch (2007) has proposed a new model for inertia (MiHsC) that assumes that the inertia of an object is due to the Unruh radiation it sees when it accelerates, radiation which is also subject to a Hubble-scale Casimir effect. In…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — mentioned by officialjunk

Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:35:01 GMT

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — mentioned by officialjunk

Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:25:39 GMT

one of the proposed physics theories on how the EM Drive works actually rids us of the need to even have dark matter/energy as a concept. of course it had yet to be proven/accepted, and may in fact be disproven at some point. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.03449v1.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive — HN submission

Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:27:17 GMT

Testing quantised inertia on the emdrive

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.