<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A universal tradeoff between power, precision and speed in physical communication · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.07758/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.07758/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A universal tradeoff between power, precision and speed in physical communication — mentioned by tMcGrath</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19502042</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.07758:19502042</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:43:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as I know, a good differential-geometric understanding of nonequilibrium thermodynamics still hasn&amp;#x27;t been achieved. The central issue is understanding how changes in control parameters (for instance concentrations of catalysts in a chemical system, or local fields in a spin system) affect the evolution of the probability distribution over states. Some work has been done in close to steady state (for instance [1,2,3]) but it&amp;#x27;s far from resolved. This has some nice applications - designing efficient protocols for microscale devices, for instance. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07758 [2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.07758/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item></channel></rss>
