<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dynamics of galaxies and clusters in \textit{refracted gravity} · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04943/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04943/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dynamics of galaxies and clusters in \textit{refracted gravity} — mentioned by schiffern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34366518</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1603.04943:34366518</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:45:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I was hoping someone would mention globular clusters! I couldn&amp;#x27;t find a way to integrate it naturally in my post. I don&amp;#x27;t see any information about globular cluster movement in that image. Naturally the confinement wouldn&amp;#x27;t be 100%, and some amount of gravity would still &amp;quot;leak out,&amp;quot;[1] so the mere existence of globular clusters isn&amp;#x27;t proof one way or another. Surveying globular clusters offers a good test. RG might (or might not) explain why globular clusters are mysteriously 1) preferentially orbiting perpendicular to the primary galaxy&amp;#x27;s rotation, perhaps due to stability, and 2)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1603.04943/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
